Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Jennifer Brady
WTA Cincinnati 2021 - Aug, 17th 2021.
1/32-FINALS

0 - 2
36  673-7 
offense
defense
forehand
backhand
serve
form

MATCH INFORMATION

hard court icon  warning icon  tennis betting guide icon  video icon 
Hard court - J. Brady retired in one of her last 3 matches - Tennis betting guide Videos available

Closing odds - money line

+207
-123

E. Alexandrova vs J. Brady Predictions (from BetzCenter's Experts)

There were no picks on this match by our experts

MATCH PREVIEW

There is no real favorite in this match. In terms of odds, the current favorite is Jennifer Brady. But, with moneyline odds of -123, she only has a 55.25% implied probability of winning. Her opponent, Ekaterina Alexandrova, is a balanced underdog and currently priced at +207 on the money line; which means a 48.31% implied probability.

Speaking about form status and latest results, our algorythm has given Ekaterina Alexandrova's form a 5/10. With 2 wins in her last 5 matches, Ekaterina Alexandrova has proved to be in poor form.
Her opponent, Jennifer Brady has won 2 of her last 5 matches and has lost 3. Our system has assigned a 4/10 value to Jennifer Brady's form.

Closing odds

Money line

+207 - -123

Spread

-111 [1.00] -108
under

Totals

over
-120 [21.50] -120

Your best bookmaker to bet on WTA Cincinnati

E. Alexandrova vs J. Brady Odds Movement

(To see E. Alexandrova vs J. Brady Predictionss on the graph, please log in)

All Fixture Videos

A collection of videos from BetzCenter's archive that might be useful to watch to place the right bet on this game.

O. Jabeur vs J. Brady (25 Feb 2020)
O. Jabeur vs J. Brady (25 Feb 2020)
J. Brady vs A. Riske (24 Feb 2020)
A. Anisimova vs E. Alexandrova (23 Feb 2020)
S. Halep vs J. Brady (21 Feb 2020)
J. Brady vs M. Vondrousova (19 Feb 2020)
E. Svitolina vs J. Brady (18 Feb 2020)
E. Alexandrova vs K. Bertens (15 Feb 2020)
D. Vekic vs E. Alexandrova (13 Feb 2020)
D. Kasatkina vs E. Alexandrova (11 Feb 2020)

News

Ekaterina Alexandrova

Jennifer Brady

We use cookies, read more here. OK